Les Workers SEO aident les rédacteurs et les équipes éditoriales à rendre le contenu plus facile à comprendre, structurer, retrouver et approuver. Ils relisent les métadonnées, les extraits de recherche, le schema, la santé technique, la confiance et les preuves, et font remonter ce qui compte pendant que le rédacteur façonne encore le travail. Chaque résultat est destiné à une relecture humaine.
Inspects the live page and extracts the source signals the rest of the workflow depends on: title, meta description, headings, links, images, schema and word count.
Checks the technical signals behind a page — metadata, headings, indexability and structure — and reports what needs a closer look.
Reviews whether the content, structure, metadata and next step of a page line up with the likely search or reader intent.
Reviews the evidence behind findings and recommendations, checking support strength, unsupported claims, provenance and limitations before approval.
Reviews how a page connects to other content: internal links, external links, anchor quality, reader pathways and whether the page appears isolated or poorly connected.
Reviews the structured data on a page and recommends the schema types that match what the page actually is, for review.
Reviews accessibility signals available in the page evidence, flagging weak heading structure, missing image alternatives, unclear link text and readability risks for editorial review.
Reviews a page for intent conflict, overlap risk and unclear content role, helping editors decide whether to sharpen, support, consolidate or manually check it against other pages.
Reviews freshness signals and content decay risk, helping editors decide whether a page is still current, needs monitoring, should be refreshed, or requires urgent review.
Reviews topical coverage signals and content gaps, helping editors see whether a page looks strong, needs support, is incomplete, or requires a wider content plan.
Reviews conversion alignment: CTA clarity, trust signals, proof gaps and whether the next step makes sense for the page intent.
Reviews whether the current content format matches the likely intent and expected page shape, flagging format conflicts and missing structural elements.
Reviews internal link pathway health: orphan risk, anchor text quality, hub-and-spoke relationships, missing next-step links and pathway coherence.
Reviews content maintenance signals: overlap risk, thin content, decay, unclear role and weak pathways, helping editors decide the safest next maintenance action.
Looks at how a page is likely to appear in search results and points out snippet and rich-result opportunities worth shaping for.
Helps identify the pages in a website project so editors can see what needs review, where the content opportunities are and how the site begins to fit together.
Reviews semantic coverage by comparing content against Word Presto's knowledge layer and project context, surfacing missing subtopics and thinly covered entities.
Reviews competitor coverage from stored SERP competitor data, surfacing the subtopics, entities and angles competitors appear to cover that your content may be missing.
